top of page

Blanket Purchase Agreement Under Federal Supply Schedule Cannot Expire Before Total Potential Offering Period

  • Writer: R.D. Lieberman,Consultant
    R.D. Lieberman,Consultant
  • Oct 2
  • 2 min read

The Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) supported an agency decision and found a protester was ineligible for award where its Federal Supply Schedule (“FSS”) contract included too short a period of performance to cover the potential duration of the blanket purchase agreement (“BPA”).  KesselRun Corp. Travel Sols., LLC, B-423311, April 10, 2025.


The General Services Administration ("GSA") sought the establishment of a BPA for travel and expense consulting services. The solicitation stated that the “ultimate completion date of the BPA is five years from the date of award if all options are exercised by the Government…" The last option period ran from Feb. 7, 2009 to Feb. 6, 2030.  But KesselRun’s FSS contract, through the end of the last option period, expired on January 10, 2030, and the contracting officer concluded that the firm’s quotation was not eligible for award.  GAO agreed with the GSA.


When GAO sought the views of GSA, which administers the FSS program, GSA explained that the FSS contract against which the BPA would be issued must have sufficient options to cover the entirety of the period of performance of the BPA, inclusive of all potential options.  The reason for this is that, unlike an order, a BPA cannot survive the expiration of the underlying FSS contract. (Note:  FSS orders normally include a statement that if an order is issued prior to the end of the contract, the contractor must complete that order). 


The protester cited no authority in law or regulation that supported its assertion that a period of performance can only be that which is obligated, in this case, the first year out of five possible years. The GAO found GSA’s exclusion of Kessel Run’s quotation from the competition on the basis that its FSS contract would not cover the period of performance of the BPA to be correct, and denied the protest.


Takeaway.  If you compete for a BPA, make sure that the ending date of that BPA period of performance covers the entirety of the performance under any options, and does not extend beyond the ending date of your FSS contract. As noted in the Federal Acquisition Regulation, a BPA is not an actual contract.  See FAR 16.702 (Basic agreement is not itself a contract, but merely contains clauses that will be required. Contracts based on such agreements must include a scope of work, and price, delivery and other applicable terms. Id.).


For other helpful suggestions on government contracting, visit:

Richard D. Lieberman’s FAR Consulting & Training at https://www.richarddlieberman.com/, and Mistakes in Government Contracting at https://richarddlieberman.wixsite.com/mistakes.

 

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


The website of Richard Donald Lieberman, a government contracts consultant and retired attorney who is the author of both "The 100 Worst Mistakes in Government Contracting" (with Jason Morgan) and "The 100 Worst Government Mistakes in Government Contracting." Richard Lieberman concentrates on Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) consulting and training, including  commercial item contracting (FAR Part 12), compliance with proposal requirements (FAR Part 15 negotiated procurement), sealed bidding (FAR Part 14), compliance with solicitation requirements, contract administration (FAR Part 42), contract modifications and changes (FAR Part 43), subcontracting and flowdown requirements (FAR Part 44), government property (FAR Part 45), quality assurance (FAR Part 46), obtaining invoiced payments owed to contractors,  and other compliance with the FAR. Mr.Lieberman is also involved in numerous community service activities.  See LinkedIn profile at https://www.linkedin.com/in/richard-d-lieberman-3a25257a/.This website and blog are for educational and information purposes only.  Nothing posted on this website constitutes legal advice, which can only be obtained from a qualified attorney. Website Owner/Consultant does not engage in the practice of law and will not provide legal advice or legal services based on competence and standing in the law. Legal filings and other aspects of a legal practice must be performed by an appropriate attorney. Using this website does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Although the author strives to present accurate information, the information provided on this site is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date.  The views expressed on this blog are solely those of the author. FAR Consulting & Training, Bethesda, Maryland, Tel. 202-520-5780, rliebermanconsultant@gmail.com

Copyright © 2024 Richard D. Lieberman

bottom of page