top of page

Sum Certain Not Negated by Language to Prevent Double Counting

Writer's picture: R.D. Lieberman,ConsultantR.D. Lieberman,Consultant

Readers know that to provide a complete claim, one of the elements is that the contractor provide a “sum certain” for the dollar damages that are sought.  You cannot qualify the sum by stating that it is “approximate” or “about” since that is not a certain sum.  But what if you explain in your claim that the sum stated could be changed if there are other payments made, i.e., there may be some double counting.  A4 Const. Co, Inc., ASBCA Nos. 63252,  et al provides the answer.


A4 Const. received a copy from the Army Corps of Engineers (the “Corps”) for design and construction of a special operations mountaineering facility at Fort Carson Colorado.  A4 submitted a claim for four separate items (COVID related price increases, Extra work and differing site conditions, jobsite flooding, and other increases. These separate claims were consolidated in this case.


The Government moved to dismiss the contractor’s appeal of the Corps’ claim denial, asserting that  A4’s overall claim failed to meet the sum certain requirement. The Corps’ pointed to a footnote whereby A4 stated that the claimed amount should be adjusted as needed to avoid a double payment if the Corps pays some of the claimed subcontractor costs to the bonding company that subsequently pays the subcontractor directly.  The Corps asserted that this qualifying language prevented the number from being a sum certain.

The Board rejected this motion, and stated that an indication that a claim may need adjusting in the future does not invalidate the sum certain.  That was precisely what A4 did, and A4’s notification of a possible future adjustment to prevent a potential double recovery does not defeat the sum certain requirement. Accordingly the Board rejected the Government’s motion to dismiss all the claims. 


However, the Board agreed to dismiss 3 of the claims that were consolidated in this case because they failed to provide a sum certain for each individual claim submission to the contracting officer.


Takeaway.  If you suspect that there will be double counting of the amount in your claim (or some other important future change), you may provide a sum certain that may be modified in the future if that eventuality occurs.  The sum certain may be adjusted.  But be sure that each separate claim includes an adequate notice of the claim amount (i.e., a sum certain).


For other helpful suggestions on government contracting, visit:

Richard D. Lieberman’s FAR Consulting & Training at https://www.richarddlieberman.com/, and Mistakes in Government Contracting at https://richarddlieberman.wixsite.com/mistakes.

 

5 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Commenti


The website of Richard Donald Lieberman, a government contracts consultant and retired attorney who is the author of both "The 100 Worst Mistakes in Government Contracting" (with Jason Morgan) and "The 100 Worst Government Mistakes in Government Contracting." Richard Lieberman concentrates on Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) consulting and training, including  commercial item contracting (FAR Part 12), compliance with proposal requirements (FAR Part 15 negotiated procurement), sealed bidding (FAR Part 14), compliance with solicitation requirements, contract administration (FAR Part 42), contract modifications and changes (FAR Part 43), subcontracting and flowdown requirements (FAR Part 44), government property (FAR Part 45), quality assurance (FAR Part 46), obtaining invoiced payments owed to contractors,  and other compliance with the FAR. Mr.Lieberman is also involved in numerous community service activities.  See LinkedIn profile at https://www.linkedin.com/in/richard-d-lieberman-3a25257a/.This website and blog are for educational and information purposes only.  Nothing posted on this website constitutes legal advice, which can only be obtained from a qualified attorney. Website Owner/Consultant does not engage in the practice of law and will not provide legal advice or legal services based on competence and standing in the law. Legal filings and other aspects of a legal practice must be performed by an appropriate attorney. Using this website does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Although the author strives to present accurate information, the information provided on this site is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date.  The views expressed on this blog are solely those of the author. FAR Consulting & Training, Bethesda, Maryland, Tel. 202-520-5780, rliebermanconsultant@gmail.com

Copyright © 2024 Richard D. Lieberman

bottom of page