top of page

Don't Be Silent (Abandonment of a GAO Protest)

  • Writer: R.D. Lieberman,Consultant
    R.D. Lieberman,Consultant
  • 1 day ago
  • 2 min read

If you protest a procurement at the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”), it is crucial that you meet all filing deadlines.  Providing your comments on the agency report that is submitted by the procuring agency in response to the protest is especially important. The GAO rules state that “[c]omments on the agency report shall be filed within 10 days after the agency has filed the report, except where GAO has granted an extension of time or where GAO has established a shorter period for filing of comments.”  4 CFR § 21.3(i)(1).  The rules further state that “a protest shall be dismissed unless the protester files comments” within the period established in the previous section.  4 CFR § 21.3(i)(2).  The GAO enforces these rules strictly. Failure to file comments means to the GAO that the protester has “abandoned” the protest and it will be dismissed.  This is exactly what happened in Hawthorne Comm’l Constr.-Reconsideration,  B-423753.3, March 2, 2026, and the GAO dismissed the reconsideration request of the protest.

 

Sometimes protesters have no comment on the agency report.  That was the case for Hawthorne, which filed a request for consideration, received an agency report, failed to submit timely comments and had its request dismissed by GAO because that failure “indicate[d] abandonment.”  GAO noted that it is required by law to resolve protests expeditiously, 31 U.S.C. § 3554(a), and the failure to meet the deadline for submission could permit “a protester [to] idly wait after receipt of the [agency] report for an indefinite time, to the detriment of the protest and [GAO’s] ability to resolve the protest expeditiously.”  That is why the GAO rules provide for dismissal.

 

Hawthorne argued that it never filed comments because it was not required to repeat previous arguments.  But it is clear that GAO considers a failure to comment as “abandonment of the protest.” 

 

What’s the solution if you have no comments, and nothing to add after reviewing the agency report?  You are required to make a filing in response to the agency report advising the GAO that the report contains nothing new and that you decline to submit further comments.  It is probably a good idea to add that “The protester does not abandon its protest, and seeks a GAO decision on the record here.”

 

Takeaway.  Don’t be silent on an agency report at the GAO, even if you have nothing to add or refute.  Make a timely filing by the deadline for comments, and make it clear you stand on the previous record and are not abandoning your protest.

 

For other helpful suggestions on government contracting, visit:

Richard D. Lieberman’s FAR Consulting & Training at https://www.richarddlieberman.com/, and Mistakes in Government Contracting at https://richarddlieberman.wixsite.com/mistakes

 

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Each Procurement Stands on its Own

This blog has previously discussed denied protests where the protester has argued that an agency failed to evaluate in accordance with a similar but previous procurement. Now comes Low Voltage Wiring

 
 
 
Caveat Mancepts Rei Publicae

“Caveat Mancepts rei publicae,” Latin for “let the contractor for the government beware,” is how Judge Ryan T. Holte of the Court of Federal Claims (“COFC”) began his opinion in Margaret Abare v. Unit

 
 
 

Comments


The website of Richard Donald Lieberman, a government contracts consultant and retired attorney who is the author of both "The 100 Worst Mistakes in Government Contracting" (with Jason Morgan) and "The 100 Worst Government Mistakes in Government Contracting." Richard Lieberman concentrates on Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) consulting and training, including  commercial item contracting (FAR Part 12), compliance with proposal requirements (FAR Part 15 negotiated procurement), sealed bidding (FAR Part 14), compliance with solicitation requirements, contract administration (FAR Part 42), contract modifications and changes (FAR Part 43), subcontracting and flowdown requirements (FAR Part 44), government property (FAR Part 45), quality assurance (FAR Part 46), obtaining invoiced payments owed to contractors,  and other compliance with the FAR. Mr.Lieberman is also involved in numerous community service activities.  See LinkedIn profile at https://www.linkedin.com/in/richard-d-lieberman-3a25257a/.This website and blog are for educational and information purposes only.  Nothing posted on this website constitutes legal advice, which can only be obtained from a qualified attorney. Website Owner/Consultant does not engage in the practice of law and will not provide legal advice or legal services based on competence and standing in the law. Legal filings and other aspects of a legal practice must be performed by an appropriate attorney. Using this website does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Although the author strives to present accurate information, the information provided on this site is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date.  The views expressed on this blog are solely those of the author. FAR Consulting & Training, Bethesda, Maryland, Tel. 202-520-5780, rliebermanconsultant@gmail.com

Copyright © 2024 Richard D. Lieberman

bottom of page