top of page

Final Proposal Revision Extinguishes Agency Ability to Accept an Earlier Offer

  • Writer: R.D. Lieberman,Consultant
    R.D. Lieberman,Consultant
  • Jul 1
  • 2 min read

In a recent protest sustained by the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”), the GAO concluded that once an initial offer has been replaced with the offer contained in a final proposal revision (“FPR”), the agency can no longer accept the initial offer. UNICA-BPA JV, LLC, B-422580.3, Jan 8, 2025.  The issue concerned a System for Award Management (“SAM”) registration requirement that was not in effect at the of the initial offer, but the offeror obtained active registration at the time of FPR. 


The Department of Homeland Security issued a solicitation for dormitory management services.  UNICA was placed in the competitive range, and the agency opened discussions with UNICA, and identified clarifications, verifications or resubmissions necessary. At the close of discussions, UNICA submitted its final proposal revisions.  Homeland Security made award to another vendor, even though UNICA had, prior to submitting its FPR, received its registration in SAM.


The agency alleged that FAR 52.204-7 stated that “an offeror is required to be registered in SAM when submitting an offer.” And UNICA had not SAM registration at the time of its initial offer.  The GAO sustained UNICA’s protest, on the following basis.


The Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”) defines “offer” as a response to a solicitation that, if accepted, would bind the offeror to perform the resultant contract.” FAR 2.101.  In the context of a request for proposal  (which this procurement was) the submission of a final proposal revision “demonstrates an offeror’s intent to modify or replace its initial offer, thus extinguishes an agency’s ability to accept the earlier offer.”  Essentially submission of an FPR effectively revokes the offeror’s initial proposal.  When Homeland Security entered into discussions and asked for FPR’s, the submission of its FPR extinguished UNICA’s initial proposal.  And by the time the FPR was submitted, UNICA had been registered in SAM successfully.  The agency’s decision to eliminate UNICA for failing to have an active SAM registration at the time of its initial offer (but not the offer in the FPR) was unreasonable—and UNICA had a substantial chance of receiving award.  In sustaining the protest, GAO recommended that the agency make a new award decision.


Takeaway.  Your initial offer is extinguished if you prepare a submit an FPR in response to the agency’s request.  Any failure in the initial offer (such as not being registered in SAM) can be corrected by the time you submit the FPR.


For other helpful suggestions on government contracting, visit:

Richard D. Lieberman’s FAR Consulting & Training at https://www.richarddlieberman.com/, and Mistakes in Government Contracting at https://richarddlieberman.wixsite.com/mistakes.

 

 

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


The website of Richard Donald Lieberman, a government contracts consultant and retired attorney who is the author of both "The 100 Worst Mistakes in Government Contracting" (with Jason Morgan) and "The 100 Worst Government Mistakes in Government Contracting." Richard Lieberman concentrates on Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) consulting and training, including  commercial item contracting (FAR Part 12), compliance with proposal requirements (FAR Part 15 negotiated procurement), sealed bidding (FAR Part 14), compliance with solicitation requirements, contract administration (FAR Part 42), contract modifications and changes (FAR Part 43), subcontracting and flowdown requirements (FAR Part 44), government property (FAR Part 45), quality assurance (FAR Part 46), obtaining invoiced payments owed to contractors,  and other compliance with the FAR. Mr.Lieberman is also involved in numerous community service activities.  See LinkedIn profile at https://www.linkedin.com/in/richard-d-lieberman-3a25257a/.This website and blog are for educational and information purposes only.  Nothing posted on this website constitutes legal advice, which can only be obtained from a qualified attorney. Website Owner/Consultant does not engage in the practice of law and will not provide legal advice or legal services based on competence and standing in the law. Legal filings and other aspects of a legal practice must be performed by an appropriate attorney. Using this website does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Although the author strives to present accurate information, the information provided on this site is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date.  The views expressed on this blog are solely those of the author. FAR Consulting & Training, Bethesda, Maryland, Tel. 202-520-5780, rliebermanconsultant@gmail.com

Copyright © 2024 Richard D. Lieberman

bottom of page