top of page

Not A Final Contracting Officer's Decision

  • Writer: R.D. Lieberman,Consultant
    R.D. Lieberman,Consultant
  • Mar 30, 2024
  • 2 min read

The Contract Disputes Act (“CDA”), 41 USC §§ 7101-7109, requires both a claim and a contracting officer’s (“CO”) decision on a claim prior to making an appeal to a Board of Contract Appeals.  FAR 2.101 defines a claim as “a written demand or written assertion by one of the contracting parties seeking, as a matter of right, the payment of money in a sum certain.”  Without a CO decision (or a deemed denial of a claim), a contractor may take no appeal to the Board or to the Court of Federal Claims.  This is precisely what happened in Optum Public Sector Sols. v. Dept of Veterans Affairs, CBCA 7920, Nov. 21, 2023, where there was no final CO decision. The Board dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.


The Dept of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) CO sent Optum a letter responding to the contractor’s request for a guidance letter on payment guidelines that had been issued earlier.  VA requested that Optum reimburse VA for any demand for payment in accordance with FAR 32.604.  The CO’s letter did not quantify the amount owed, state that the letter was a final decision, or provide Optum with notice of its appeal rights.

 

The Board noted that a letter lacking a statement that it is a final decision, or providing a notice of appeal rights, is not fatal to the issuance of a final CO decision.  However, the CO’s failure to quantify the amount owed and thereby state a sum certain demonstrated that the CO lacked the intent to issue a government claim.  Furthermore, the CO mentioned the demand process in FAR 32.604, indicating that Optum’s letter was only a step in the assertion of a formal demand for repayment, but not a final decision.  To be a final claim in this process, the CO must notify the contractor of the final claim, and permit it to respond.  The CO’s letter in this matter did neither of those two things.


As a result, lacking an actual claim and a final CO decision, the Board dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction.


Takeaway.  When a contractor is seeking a final decision under the CDA, ask for a “final decision of the CO” in your claim letter.  Also include in your claim letter the other requirements that have been discussed in numerous previous blogs. If you are unsure if a CO letter is a “final decision,” write back to the CO and ask if it is a final decision.

 

For other helpful suggestions on government contracting, visit:

Richard D. Lieberman’s FAR Consulting & Training at https://www.richarddlieberman.com/, and Mistakes in Government Contracting at https://richarddlieberman.wixsite.com/mistakes.

 

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


The website of Richard Donald Lieberman, a government contracts consultant and retired attorney who is the author of both "The 100 Worst Mistakes in Government Contracting" (with Jason Morgan) and "The 100 Worst Government Mistakes in Government Contracting." Richard Lieberman concentrates on Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) consulting and training, including  commercial item contracting (FAR Part 12), compliance with proposal requirements (FAR Part 15 negotiated procurement), sealed bidding (FAR Part 14), compliance with solicitation requirements, contract administration (FAR Part 42), contract modifications and changes (FAR Part 43), subcontracting and flowdown requirements (FAR Part 44), government property (FAR Part 45), quality assurance (FAR Part 46), obtaining invoiced payments owed to contractors,  and other compliance with the FAR. Mr.Lieberman is also involved in numerous community service activities.  See LinkedIn profile at https://www.linkedin.com/in/richard-d-lieberman-3a25257a/.This website and blog are for educational and information purposes only.  Nothing posted on this website constitutes legal advice, which can only be obtained from a qualified attorney. Website Owner/Consultant does not engage in the practice of law and will not provide legal advice or legal services based on competence and standing in the law. Legal filings and other aspects of a legal practice must be performed by an appropriate attorney. Using this website does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Although the author strives to present accurate information, the information provided on this site is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date.  The views expressed on this blog are solely those of the author. FAR Consulting & Training, Bethesda, Maryland, Tel. 202-520-5780, rliebermanconsultant@gmail.com

Copyright © 2024 Richard D. Lieberman

bottom of page