• R.D. Lieberman,Consultant

Report of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals for 2020

On October 27, 2020, the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (“ASBCA” or “Board”) released its report on transactions and proceedings for fiscal year (“FY”) 2020. The report is interesting for its discussion, rather than the actual the case count.


A total of 497 cases were docketed in FY 2020. Although this was higher than the 418 cases for the previous year it was not as large a number as in FY 16 and FY 17.


A total of 363 cases were disposed of in FY 2020, of which 240 were dismissed. The Board noted that in the majority of the dismissals, the parties reached settlement. There were 123 cases disposed on the merits, of which 65 (53%) were sustained in whole or in part and 58 were denied. In October 2020, 947 cases were pending on the docket.


The Board held only 15 hearings for a total of 32 days. A total of 32 cases were voluntarily diverted from the regular trial docket to the Board’s Alternative Dispute Resolution (“ADR”) program.


In FY 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit docketed 8 appeals from Board decisions and disposed of 16 appeals involving ASBCA decisions. Of those, 13 were affirmed, one was reversed and remanded and two were dismissed.


The Board discussed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that all of the Board’s employees began working remotely on March 12th and most employees continue to work remotely. This was made possible through a new electronic case management system, and the employees’ ability to adapt quickly to the new software and the remote working environment.


The principal areas of the Board’s workload that have declined were hearings and ADRs. Even though the Board developed a capability to conduct such proceedings remotely, litigants have pushed them forward into the future, presumably in the hope the proceedings could soon be conducted in person. However, because the pandemic persisted, the Board is beginning to receive requests for and begin conducting remote hearings and ADRs, in which the Board expects a significant upward trend during FY 2021.




For other helpful suggestions on government contracting, visit:

Richard D. Lieberman’s FAR Consulting & Training at https://www.richarddlieberman.com/, and Mistakes in Government Contracting at https://richarddlieberman.wixsite.com/mistakes.



4 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

"Pervasive Errors" In Source Selection

It is rare when the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) says that agency actions in its source selection for two different contractors showed “pervasive errors in the conduct of the competition a

The website of Richard Donald Lieberman, a government contracts consultant and retired attorney who is the author of both "The 100 Worst Mistakes in Government Contracting" (with Jason Morgan) and "The 100 Worst Government Mistakes in Government Contracting." Richard Lieberman concentrates on Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) consulting and training, including  commercial item contracting (FAR Part 12), compliance with proposal requirements (FAR Part 15 negotiated procurement), sealed bidding (FAR Part 14), compliance with solicitation requirements, contract administration (FAR Part 42), contract modifications and changes (FAR Part 43), subcontracting and flowdown requirements (FAR Part 44), government property (FAR Part 45), quality assurance (FAR Part 46), obtaining invoiced payments owed to contractors,  and other compliance with the FAR. Mr.Lieberman is also involved in numerous community service activities.  See LinkedIn profile at https://www.linkedin.com/in/richard-d-lieberman-3a25257a/.This website and blog are for educational and information purposes only.  Nothing posted on this website constitutes legal advice, which can only be obtained from a qualified attorney. Website Owner/Consultant does not engage in the practice of law and will not provide legal advice or legal services based on competence and standing in the law. Legal filings and other aspects of a legal practice must be performed by an appropriate attorney. Using this website does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Although the author strives to present accurate information, the information provided on this site is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date.  The views expressed on this blog are solely those of the author. FAR Consulting & Training, Bethesda, Maryland, Tel. 202-520-5780, rliebermanconsultant@gmail.com

Copyright © 2020 Richard D. Lieberman