top of page

Your Protest Must Be Timely at Both the Agency and GAO

  • Writer: R.D. Lieberman,Consultant
    R.D. Lieberman,Consultant
  • Aug 22, 2024
  • 2 min read

It is essential that a bid protest submitted in any forum must be timely in accordance with that forum’s rules. If a protester previously files a timely agency level protest where a timely agency protest was previously filed, any subsequent protest to the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) must be filed within 10 days of constructive knowledge of initial adverse agency action on the agency level protest.  But the agency level protest must be timely. 


In DSoft Tech., Eng’rg & Analysis, B-422254, Feb. 26, 2024, the protester failed to meet the agency timeliness filing, and the GAO dismissed the protest as untimely.

Here is what happened.  On October 3, 2023, the Department of Veterans Affairs provided DSoft with an award notice (i.e. award to another contractor) in a procurement for support to application systems. On October 5, 2023, the agency provided DSoft with a brief explanation of the basis of award, in addition to information previously provided in the award. DSoft requested further clarification of the explanation on Oct. 13, 2023, but apparently did not receive it.  DSoft then filed an agency level protest on October 16, 2023, asserting that it was timely filed within 10 days of the agency’s response to DSoft’s request for clarification on October 13, 2023.


The GAO noted that the FAR, which governs agency level protests, requires that they be filed within 10 days after the basis of protest is known or should have been known.  DSoft asserted that its protest was timely, because of the requested clarifications (which was a form of a request for a debriefing). GAO will not consider a protest if the protester has filed an untimely protest at the agency first.


The GAO noted first that the FAR rules govern an agency level protest.  Further, GAO noted that the “debriefing exception” does not apply to agency level protests.  The debriefing exception is a protest which challenges a procurement conducted on the basis of competitive proposals under which a debriefing is requested, and when requested is required.  In those cases where a debriefing is required, the protest must be filed at the agency no later than 10 days after the date on which the debriefing is held.  4 CFR § 21.2(a)(2).  Since no debriefing was required in this procurement, the time calculation was based on the agency level protest on October 16, more than 10 days after receipt of the award notice or publicly available information that the protest was based on.


Takeaway.  Any GAO protest must comply with GAO’s timeliness rules.  There is no debriefing exception in the rules for agency level protests, so they must be submitted within 10 days after award or constructive notice of award.  Further, if your protest is untimely at the agency, you cannot “rescue” it by submitting a protest at GAO in a subsequent filing.

For other helpful suggestions on government contracting, visit:

Richard D. Lieberman’s FAR Consulting & Training at https://www.richarddlieberman.com/, and Mistakes in Government Contracting at https://richarddlieberman.wixsite.com/mistakes.

 

 

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Invalid "Final Decision"

Does the absence of a required claim render a Contracting Officer’s (“CO”) “final” decision invalid?.  The answer is simple, such a...

 
 
 

Comments


The website of Richard Donald Lieberman, a government contracts consultant and retired attorney who is the author of both "The 100 Worst Mistakes in Government Contracting" (with Jason Morgan) and "The 100 Worst Government Mistakes in Government Contracting." Richard Lieberman concentrates on Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) consulting and training, including  commercial item contracting (FAR Part 12), compliance with proposal requirements (FAR Part 15 negotiated procurement), sealed bidding (FAR Part 14), compliance with solicitation requirements, contract administration (FAR Part 42), contract modifications and changes (FAR Part 43), subcontracting and flowdown requirements (FAR Part 44), government property (FAR Part 45), quality assurance (FAR Part 46), obtaining invoiced payments owed to contractors,  and other compliance with the FAR. Mr.Lieberman is also involved in numerous community service activities.  See LinkedIn profile at https://www.linkedin.com/in/richard-d-lieberman-3a25257a/.This website and blog are for educational and information purposes only.  Nothing posted on this website constitutes legal advice, which can only be obtained from a qualified attorney. Website Owner/Consultant does not engage in the practice of law and will not provide legal advice or legal services based on competence and standing in the law. Legal filings and other aspects of a legal practice must be performed by an appropriate attorney. Using this website does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Although the author strives to present accurate information, the information provided on this site is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date.  The views expressed on this blog are solely those of the author. FAR Consulting & Training, Bethesda, Maryland, Tel. 202-520-5780, rliebermanconsultant@gmail.com

Copyright © 2024 Richard D. Lieberman

bottom of page